From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Doug Ledford Subject: Re: Autosense requirement Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 17:58:27 -0400 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20020729175827.N20905@redhat.com> References: <3D453CE8.5A15FCD6@splentec.com> <3D457FF3.C7A02C57@torque.net> <20020729155518.B20905@redhat.com> <20020729145326.A23512@beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from aladin.rdu.redhat.com (aladin.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.57.71]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g6TLwRm01016 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 17:58:27 -0400 Received: (from dledford@localhost) by aladin.rdu.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g6TLwRs21048 for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 17:58:27 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020729145326.A23512@beaverton.ibm.com>; from andmike@us.ibm.com on Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 02:53:26PM -0700 List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 02:53:26PM -0700, Mike Anderson wrote: > Doug, > I assume from your message that you are removing the call from > scsi_unjam_host to do request sense (which is good). > > Does this imply that your reworking all of the eh handling in > scsi_error.c? Yeah, I had some stuff I want to do there. However, I'm currently working on other things right now. I was saving this for later :-/ > I was doing some rework in this area, but it sounds like it might > be counter to your work. Go ahead. I'm not into that section yet. -- Doug Ledford 919-754-3700 x44233 Red Hat, Inc. 1801 Varsity Dr. Raleigh, NC 27606