From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Doug Ledford Subject: Re: Autosense requirement Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 19:00:48 -0400 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20020729190048.V20905@redhat.com> References: <3D453CE8.5A15FCD6@splentec.com> <3D457FF3.C7A02C57@torque.net> <20020729155518.B20905@redhat.com> <20020729145326.A23512@beaverton.ibm.com> <20020729175827.N20905@redhat.com> <20020729151027.A2657@eng2.beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020729151027.A2657@eng2.beaverton.ibm.com>; from patmans@us.ibm.com on Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 03:10:27PM -0700 List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Patrick Mansfield Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 03:10:27PM -0700, Patrick Mansfield wrote: > Doug - > > I'm also doing some scsi changes - scsi_scan.c cleanup, and > multi-path IO support. I saw the posts you made on this. I was just getting ready to look at/integrate your scsi_scan.c changes then add on the additional stuff I had in mind. I thought I saw you say you were forward porting the changes to 2.5.28 so it will apply cleanly. Once I saw that patch come out I was going to grab it. > Do you have a tree or such that we can sync up with? Not anything available yet (it's too broken right now). > Any moderate changes to scsi will likely affect the multi-path changes. Yep, that I can see for sure... -- Doug Ledford 919-754-3700 x44233 Red Hat, Inc. 1801 Varsity Dr. Raleigh, NC 27606