From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Cc: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux v2.4.19-rc5
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 10:48:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020806084851.GC1164@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.44.0208061024570.27501-100000@mimas.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>
On Tue, Aug 06 2002, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Aug 2002, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> >...
> > try a work load that excercises the block i/o layer alone (O_DIRECT,
> > raw, whatnot) and then compare 2.4 and 2.5. ibm had some slides on this
> > from ols, unfortunately I don't know if they have then online.
> >...
>
> Pages 390-406 in
>
> http://www.linux.org.uk/~ajh/ols2002_proceedings.pdf.gz
>
> or are you talking about something different?
Right thanks, exactly those. Table 3 on page 395 is the one I noted.
Forget readv, as that hasn't been done in 2.5 yet. I'd say a 2.5.17
untweaked kernel beating 2.4 tweaked beyond recognition isn't too shabby
for a devel series kernel.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-06 8:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-01 6:38 Linux v2.4.19-rc5 Marcelo Tosatti
2002-08-01 7:49 ` Jens Axboe
2002-08-01 7:14 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2002-08-01 8:10 ` Jens Axboe
2002-08-01 9:02 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-01 8:58 ` Jens Axboe
2002-08-01 14:45 ` Steven Cole
2002-08-01 18:57 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-01 20:15 ` Steven Cole
2002-08-06 3:46 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-08-06 4:30 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-06 14:07 ` Steven Cole
2002-08-06 14:20 ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-06 17:12 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-06 5:42 ` Jens Axboe
2002-08-06 8:30 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-08-06 8:48 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2002-08-06 10:31 ` Lincoln Dale
2002-08-06 12:59 ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-07 1:09 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-08-07 2:54 ` Steven Cole
2002-08-07 22:30 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-08-07 22:39 ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-07 23:44 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-08-07 23:53 ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-09 17:46 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-08-09 19:27 ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-01 7:55 ` Keith Owens
2002-08-01 8:10 ` Jens Axboe
2002-08-04 6:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-08-01 11:32 ` Willy TARREAU
2002-08-01 13:54 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-01 12:48 ` Willy TARREAU
2002-08-01 12:12 ` Linux v2.4.19-rc5 - APM bug Willy TARREAU
2002-08-01 13:32 ` [PANIC] APM bug with -rc4 and -rc5 Willy TARREAU
2002-08-01 14:55 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-01 13:56 ` Willy Tarreau
2002-08-01 15:24 ` Willy Tarreau
2002-08-01 16:53 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-01 16:41 ` Willy Tarreau
2002-08-01 20:35 ` [PATCH] solved APM bug with -rc5 Willy TARREAU
2002-08-01 20:52 ` Richard Gooch
2002-08-01 20:54 ` Richard Gooch
2002-08-01 21:17 ` Willy TARREAU
2002-08-01 22:37 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-01 20:58 ` Dave Jones
2002-08-01 22:16 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-01 21:07 ` Willy Tarreau
2002-08-01 21:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-02 0:12 ` [PATCH] solved APM bug with -rc5 (take 2) Willy TARREAU
2002-08-02 1:47 ` [PATCH] pdc20265 problem Nick Orlov
2002-08-02 2:29 ` Nick Orlov
2002-08-02 12:27 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-02 12:52 ` Nick Orlov
2002-08-02 14:00 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2002-08-02 14:45 ` Nick Orlov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-08-06 4:36 Linux v2.4.19-rc5 rwhron
2002-08-07 3:00 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-08-06 20:12 Peter Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020806084851.GC1164@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=bunk@fs.tum.de \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.