From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g77B5HRw032515 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 04:05:17 -0700 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.3/Submit) id g77B5HHl032514 for linux-mips-outgoing; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 04:05:17 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: oss.sgi.com: majordomo set sender to owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com using -f Received: from dea.linux-mips.net (shaft19-f33.dialo.tiscali.de [62.246.19.33]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id g77B59Rw032504 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 04:05:11 -0700 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by dea.linux-mips.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g77A9cp13920; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 12:09:38 +0200 Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 12:09:38 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Carsten Langgaard Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" , linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: PCI patch of the day Message-ID: <20020807120938.A13850@dea.linux-mips.net> References: <3D50D857.E2DDC84F@mips.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <3D50D857.E2DDC84F@mips.com>; from carstenl@mips.com on Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 10:20:39AM +0200 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO version=2.20 X-Spam-Level: Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 10:20:39AM +0200, Carsten Langgaard wrote: > It's apparently not that easy to get the PCI code right, the current > code won't compile, so here is the patch of the day. Sigh, yes. The whole flushing thing was done improperly and the patches to fix that which I was integrating last night were not right either. The big question for me is why nobody was complaining or is suddently everybody only using coherent machines ... And all the DAC stuff also wants to be implemented. We've got a bunch of cruel hacks for the sake of IP27 and want to get rid of those. The god news is that now 32-bit and 64-bit pci.h are identical :-) Ralf