All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jörg Sonnenberger" <joerg.sonnenberger-S0/GAf8tV78@public.gmane.org>
To: ACPI devel Mailinglist
	<acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Sebastian Henschel <s.henschel-TGKKaGbebvyzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: acpi-patch + kernel 2.4.19
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 11:46:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200208081146.26336.joerg.sonnenberger@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020807215528.GA646-adzhR0EPeY/7X6WiDY61Ug@public.gmane.org>

Am Mittwoch, 7. August 2002 23:55 schrieb Sebastian Henschel:
> hi folx...
>
> did anyone of you try to install the current acpi-patch to the current
> linux kernel 2.4.19?
>

Well, I tried against 2.4.19-ac1. The patch itself creates lots of rejects, 
some of them I couldn't solve directly. 

> i am very confused, since the structure of the files in linux/drivers/acpi
> seems to have changed enormously. on the other hand, acpi from the original
> kernel still seems to be quite old (output from dmesg):
>
> ACPI: Core Subsystem version [20011018]
> ACPI: Subsystem enabled

Yep, this version doesn't support my battery state, 2.5.25 does.

>
> well, and as you can see, acpi claims to be enabled. but there is no
> /proc/acpi to be found. even with the stock 2.4.18 a couple of months ago,
> i had at least something in there.
>

That's strange. It's working for me with both the plain 2.4.18 and 2.4.19-ac1. 
Any error message in dmesg? Perhaps the bios is some kind of broken or acpi 
is inactivated per command line?

> any insights?
>
> cheers,
>  sebastian
>
> p.s.: please cc: me or group-reply, i am not on the list, so far.

Jörg


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-08-08  9:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-08-07 21:55 acpi-patch + kernel 2.4.19 Sebastian Henschel
     [not found] ` <20020807215528.GA646-adzhR0EPeY/7X6WiDY61Ug@public.gmane.org>
2002-08-07 23:27   ` Andy Dustman
2002-08-08  9:46   ` Jörg Sonnenberger [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-08-13 19:34 Grover, Andrew

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200208081146.26336.joerg.sonnenberger@web.de \
    --to=joerg.sonnenberger-s0/gaf8tv78@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=s.henschel-TGKKaGbebvyzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.