From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from jazzband.ncsc.mil (jazzband.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.4])
	by tycho.ncsc.mil (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA03990
	for <selinux@tycho.nsa.gov>; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 09:54:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from jazzband.ncsc.mil (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by jazzband.ncsc.mil  with ESMTP id NAA29185
	for <selinux@tycho.nsa.gov>; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 13:52:40 GMT
Received: from earin.connect.com.au (earin.connect.com.au [210.8.231.7])
        by jazzband.ncsc.mil  with ESMTP id NAA29181 for <selinux@tycho.nsa.gov>; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 13:52:38 GMT
Received: from devious.adversary.org (acc1-ppp420.bur.dialup.connect.net.au [61.68.120.166])
	by earin.connect.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3436A48CE
	for <selinux@tycho.nsa.gov>; Thu,  8 Aug 2002 23:54:06 +1000 (EST)
Received: (from khayman@localhost)
	by devious.adversary.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g78Drqu07474
	for selinux@tycho.nsa.gov; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 23:53:52 +1000
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 23:53:52 +1000
From: Ben McGinnes <bmcginnes@enternet.com.au>
To: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: A 'Statement of Assurance' on SELinux patents
Message-ID: <20020808235352.B4737@mail.enternet.com.au>
References: <000f01c23d4a$e938e750$0a01a8c0@ed> <20020806141841.8278925D@lyta.coker.com.au> <20020807132157.B25323@mail.enternet.com.au> <3D5114BB.D45BAD57@cpcug.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI"
In-Reply-To: <3D5114BB.D45BAD57@cpcug.org>; from agriffin@cpcug.org on Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 08:38:19AM -0400
Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov
List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov


--PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

James Griffin(agriffin@cpcug.org)@Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 08:38:19AM -0400:
>=20
> Principle or pride?  I'm not sure, but am inclined to opt for
> "principle" in Mr. Coker's case.

Well, to pick another P-word, "point" ... as in "a good one."  :)

[other good point about monopoly-potential in buying patent/SCC]

Which is one very good reason, of course, for a more well-meaning
group to purchase either the company or the patent; in order to prevent
any future corporate travesty on the part of either SCC or anyone else
they might sell the relevant patents to.


Regards,
Ben


--PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8

iQA/AwUBPVJ37zcaxb+gSuMTEQJKnQCdGvpgFPw32fZH+LNEjOwoeEacRacAoJg8
ghTkJTzrsGMHf5ezAflxGdcN
=65Ob
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI--

--
You have received this message because you are subscribed to the selinux list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.