From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Drokin Subject: Re: Corruption: --fix-fixable results in all nlink values = 0 Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 13:22:52 +0400 Message-ID: <20020819132252.A4346@namesys.com> References: <200208152007.42370.degerrit@web.de> <200208152329.40707.degerrit@web.de> <200208161205.00550.vitaly@namesys.com> <200208170254.48383.degerrit@web.de> <3D5E9D69.1030109@namesys.com> <20020819092023.B1815@namesys.com> <3D60AF63.6040809@namesys.com> <20020819124649.A2585@namesys.com> <3D60B6E2.7050006@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D60B6E2.7050006@namesys.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Hans Reiser Cc: Matthias Andree , reiserfs-list@namesys.com, god@namesys.com, mason Hello! On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 01:14:10PM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote: > >He argues that if we'd had corrupted tree, how would we know that the > >bablocks > >list is corrupted or not. Or something like that. > And he suggests doing what instead? He suggests that user should specify list of bad blocks each time user runs reiserfsck. Bye, Oleg