All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Val Henson <val@nmt.edu>
To: "Tomasz Torcz, BG" <zdzichu@irc.pl>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: 2.4 and full ipv6 - will it happen?
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 00:17:04 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020820061704.GF21389@boardwalk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1029759935.19375.12.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk>

On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 01:25:35PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-08-19 at 05:39, Tomasz Torcz, BG wrote:
> > 
> > Some time ago Linux was first OS to have full RFC complaint IPv4 stack.
> 
> There are no fully RFC compliant IPv4 stacks. The Linux networking stack
> is not capable of jumping over tall buildings.

And you'd know that if you'd played the TCP/IP drinking game:

http://www.nmt.edu/~val/tcpip.html

You're not cool unless you've submitted a question.  All the other
kids are doing it!

-VAL

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-08-20  6:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-08-19  4:39 2.4 and full ipv6 - will it happen? Tomasz Torcz, BG
2002-08-19  4:37 ` David S. Miller
2002-08-19  5:16   ` Tomasz Torcz, BG
2002-08-19  5:12     ` David S. Miller
2002-08-19 23:34   ` Thunder from the hill
2002-08-19 23:23     ` David S. Miller
2002-08-19 23:49       ` Daniel Berlin
2002-08-19 23:54       ` Alan Cox
2002-08-20  0:32       ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-20 13:54         ` kuznet
2002-08-20  6:56       ` Thunder from the hill
2002-08-21 20:24       ` Kelsey Hudson
2002-08-21 21:31         ` Bernd Eckenfels
2002-08-21 21:44           ` Thunder from the hill
2002-08-21 22:03             ` Bernd Eckenfels
2002-08-21 23:13               ` Russell King
2002-08-22  0:05                 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2002-08-22  6:08               ` Thunder from the hill
2002-08-26 18:55               ` Kelsey Hudson
2002-08-26 19:44                 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2002-08-26 21:51                 ` Michael H. Warfield
2002-08-26 23:48                   ` Bernd Eckenfels
2002-08-27 16:07                     ` Michael H. Warfield
2002-08-28 19:14                       ` Bernd Eckenfels
2002-08-29  2:05                         ` Michael H. Warfield
2002-08-29 18:47                           ` Bernd Eckenfels
2002-08-21 22:08             ` Alan Cox
2002-08-22  6:12               ` Thunder from the hill
2002-08-22 12:27                 ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-22 18:22                 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-22 18:26                 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2002-08-22 19:19                   ` Russell King
2002-09-12 15:06   ` Petr Baudis
2002-09-13  1:47     ` David S. Miller
2002-08-19  7:27 ` Chris Wedgwood
2002-08-19 12:25 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-19 22:39   ` Kelsey Hudson
2002-08-20  6:17   ` Val Henson [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-08-19 23:56 Leif Sawyer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020820061704.GF21389@boardwalk \
    --to=val@nmt.edu \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zdzichu@irc.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.