From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Mala Anand <manand@us.ibm.com>,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>,
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Bill Hartner <bhartner@us.ibm.com>,
davem@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net,
lse-tech-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: (RFC): SKB Initialization
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 15:05:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020822220525.GZ21685@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D653543.6000403@us.ibm.com>
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 12:02:27PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> You can see the entire readprofile here:
> http://www.sr71.net/~specweb99/run-specweb-100sec-2400-2.5.31-bk+4-kmap-08-22-2002-11.20.17/
> http://www.sr71.net/~specweb99/run-specweb-100sec-2400-2.5.31-bk+4-kmap-mala-08-22-2002-11.44.25/
> No, I don't know why I have so much idle time.
Hmm, I found that tiobench was spending a lot of time idle due to
__wait_on_inode() and get_request_wait(). I bumped up the size of
the inode wait table to 1024 and the request queue size to 16384
and saw that most of them then spent their time stuck on ->i_sem
during the initial open of the file they were going to pound on
for the duration of the run.
I determined this by just ^C'ing with kgdb and backtracing various
"stuck" processes. I think various profiling patches might be able to
give you an idea of what people are going to sleep on too.
Cheers,
Bill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-22 22:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-22 17:22 [Lse-tech] Re: (RFC): SKB Initialization Mala Anand
2002-08-22 18:32 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-08-22 19:02 ` Dave Hansen
2002-08-22 20:58 ` [Ibm-specweb99] " Nivedita Singhvi
2002-08-22 22:05 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2002-08-23 19:09 ` Bill Hartner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-08-23 14:44 Mala Anand
2002-08-23 16:39 ` Dave Hansen
2002-08-23 20:12 ` Bill Hartner
2002-08-23 20:30 ` Dave Hansen
2002-08-23 23:36 ` Troy Wilson
2002-08-23 20:51 ` Rick Lindsley
2002-08-23 22:41 ` David S. Miller
2002-08-23 23:14 Mala Anand
2002-08-23 23:38 Mala Anand
2002-08-23 23:55 ` David S. Miller
2002-08-25 16:17 jamal
2002-08-25 16:17 jamal
2002-08-25 22:51 ` David S. Miller
2002-08-25 22:51 ` David S. Miller
2002-08-25 20:12 Mala Anand
2002-08-26 1:02 ` jamal
2002-08-26 1:02 ` jamal
2002-08-25 20:12 Mala Anand
2002-08-26 13:04 Mala Anand
2002-08-26 13:04 Mala Anand
2002-08-26 19:28 ` Robert Olsson
2002-08-27 10:17 ` jamal
2002-08-27 10:17 ` jamal
2002-08-27 2:53 Mala Anand
2002-08-27 2:53 Mala Anand
2002-08-27 13:18 Mala Anand
2002-08-27 13:18 ` Mala Anand
2002-08-27 15:49 ` jamal
2002-08-27 15:49 ` jamal
2002-09-03 3:47 Mala Anand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020822220525.GZ21685@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
--cc=bhartner@us.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech-admin@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=manand@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.