From: Richard Zidlicky <rz@linux-m68k.org>
To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <gilbertd@treblig.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, mec@shout.net
Subject: Re: Of hanging menuconfig [cause found]
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 21:21:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020824212144.B746@linux-m68k.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020824151329.GB735@gallifrey>; from gilbertd@treblig.org on Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 04:13:29PM +0100
On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 04:13:29PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> Hi,
> make menuconfig will hang just after the parsing in the
> activate_menu loop in the case where the file scripts/lxdialog/lxdialog
> won't execute. Some error codes in this case are caught; but the case
> where the file scripts/lxdialog/lxdialog is a binary for the wrong
> architecture (case 126) is not caught. This is quite easy to trip if
> you are swapping between native and cross building - you get a couple of
> errors when you try and build make menuconfig for the first time about
> wrong binaries; in my case I just deleted those binaries and did the
> make again; however this failure is silent - it just hangs.
>
> A make mrproper is probably the best thing to do when switching - but
> the error case needs catching, and I'm sure there are other similar
> cases.
look at dmesg and add an
alias binfmt-xxxx off
to /etc/modules.conf so similar problems get caught properly - unless
you want to actually use an emulator for this architecture of course :)
This is one of the cases where I wish kmod would do something more
intelligent by default than endless loop. Would it be a good idea
to attempt loading of emulator modules only for formats that are
previously somehow registered + a few well known like aout,misc,elf?
Looking at exec.c, why isn't the result of request_module() tested?
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-25 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-24 15:13 Of hanging menuconfig [cause found] Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2002-08-24 19:21 ` Richard Zidlicky [this message]
2002-08-25 9:11 ` Russell King
2002-08-24 20:58 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-08-24 22:36 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020824212144.B746@linux-m68k.org \
--to=rz@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gilbertd@treblig.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mec@shout.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.