From: Dominik Brodowski <devel@brodo.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][2.5.32] CPU frequency and voltage scaling (0/4)
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 09:07:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020829090701.C1117@brodo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208281649540.27728-100000@home.transmeta.com>; from torvalds@transmeta.com on Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 05:08:14PM -0700
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 05:08:14PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I don't know how many policies would be needed (too many just adds
> complexity for no gain), but I _suspect_ that something like a
<snip>
> (maybe the "policy" thing actually makes a difference even for the
> fixed-frequency case: it can give hints about whether to allow C1-C3
> states when idle etc).
OK, I see the problems you mention wrt current cpufreq. But let's keep the
next version simple: and whether to allow C1-C3 is really nothing cpufreq
should take care of, as this is pure ACPI policy.
Dominik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-29 7:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-28 11:46 [PATCH][2.5.32] CPU frequency and voltage scaling (0/4) Dominik Brodowski
2002-08-28 18:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-28 18:48 ` Cort Dougan
2002-08-28 19:25 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-28 19:32 ` Cort Dougan
2002-08-29 10:26 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-08-28 19:41 ` Peter Riocreux
2002-08-28 19:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-29 9:51 ` Padraig Brady
2002-08-29 10:23 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-08-28 19:21 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-28 19:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-28 20:25 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-28 20:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-28 23:26 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-28 23:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-30 0:39 ` jw schultz
2002-08-29 7:01 ` Dominik Brodowski
2002-08-28 20:39 ` Dominik Brodowski
2002-08-28 21:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-09-06 11:31 ` Pavel Machek
2002-08-28 20:27 ` Dominik Brodowski
2002-08-28 20:19 ` Dominik Brodowski
2002-08-28 20:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-28 20:53 ` Dominik Brodowski
2002-08-28 21:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-28 23:00 ` george anzinger
2002-08-28 23:30 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-29 0:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-29 7:07 ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
2002-08-29 10:02 ` Padraig Brady
2002-08-29 10:53 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-29 13:38 ` Dave Jones
2002-08-29 18:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-29 19:24 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-29 21:22 ` george anzinger
2002-08-30 6:46 ` David Gibson
2002-08-30 7:54 ` Helge Hafting
2002-08-30 3:21 ` David Lang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-08-28 20:25 Grover, Andrew
2002-08-28 20:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-29 15:07 Pering, Trevor
2002-08-30 8:04 ` Helge Hafting
2002-08-30 11:53 ` Dave Jones
2002-08-30 12:36 ` Helge Hafting
2002-08-30 22:43 ` george anzinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020829090701.C1117@brodo.de \
--to=devel@brodo.de \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.