From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: To: jsoe0708@tiscali.be Cc: "John David Anglin" , parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Back to evms-1.0.1 && unaligne access && gdb In-Reply-To: Message from jsoe0708@tiscali.be of "Thu, 29 Aug 2002 19:12:18 +0200." <3D53B3B70000897C@ocpmta1.be.tiscali.com> References: <3D53B3B70000897C@ocpmta1.be.tiscali.com> Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 12:11:48 -0600 From: Grant Grundler Message-Id: <20020829181149.032A74829@dsl2.external.hp.com> Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: jsoe0708@tiscali.be wrote: > >for (i=0 ; i<16 ; i++){ > > if (*uip+i != 0x00) return FALSE; > >} > >return TRUE; > > > Quick test and yes that works (reduce response time 1/10). You've avoided the first visible symptom but not solved the problem. The next reference to the int embedded in the struct will cause an unaligned access fault. grant