All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ragnar Kjørstad" <kernel@ragnark.vestdata.no>
To: "Peter T. Breuer" <ptb@it.uc3m.es>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>,
	Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@free.fr>,
	Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cantab.net>,
	david.lang@digitalinsight.com,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: (fwd) Re: [RFC] mount flag "direct"
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 14:49:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020904144909.Z6228@vestdata.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200209040902.g84927L29020@oboe.it.uc3m.es>; from ptb@it.uc3m.es on Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 11:02:07AM +0200

On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 11:02:07AM +0200, Peter T. Breuer wrote:
> > There is more to coherency and preserving fs structure than "don't cache
> 
> Sure. So what?  What's wrong with a O_DIRDIRECT flag that makes all
> opens retrace the path from the root fs _on disk_ instead of from the 
> directory cache? 

Did you read Antons post about this?

> I suggest that changing FS structure is an operation that is so
> relatively rare  in the projected environment (in which gigabytes of
> /data/ are streaming through every second) that you can make them as
> expensive as you like and nobody will notice. 

Why do you want a filesystem if you're not going to use any filesystem
operations? If all you want to do is to split your shared device into
multipe (static) logical units use a logical volume manager. 

If you _do_ need a filesystem, use something like gfs. Have you looked
at it at all?



-- 
Ragnar Kjørstad
Big Storage

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-09-04 12:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-03 21:48 (fwd) Re: [RFC] mount flag "direct" Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-03 22:19 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-09-03 22:42   ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-03 22:52     ` Xavier Bestel
2002-09-03 23:44       ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-04  7:06         ` Alexander Viro
2002-09-04  9:02           ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-04 11:05             ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-09-04 11:39               ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-04 14:13                 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-09-05 22:45                   ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-05 23:06                     ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-09-05 23:17                       ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-05 23:24                         ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-09-06  8:57                           ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-06  9:08                             ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-09-06  9:17                               ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-06  9:50                                 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2002-09-06 14:10                                   ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-06 13:20                                 ` Helge Hafting
2002-09-06 13:22                                 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-06 13:53                                   ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-06 15:32                                     ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-06 14:25                       ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-06 17:20                         ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-09-06 17:33                           ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-06 19:32                             ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-09-06 18:29                           ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-06 19:30                             ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-09-09 16:30                           ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-17 11:21                             ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-09-05  8:30                 ` Helge Hafting
2002-09-05  8:43                   ` David Lang
2002-09-05 14:24                   ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-05 16:59                     ` David Lang
2002-09-05 23:08                     ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-06  8:14                     ` Ingo Oeser
2002-09-06  9:06                     ` Helge Hafting
2002-09-04 12:49             ` Ragnar Kjørstad [this message]
2002-09-04 12:54               ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-04 13:22                 ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2002-09-05  3:36                 ` Edgar Toernig
2002-09-05  3:58                   ` Alexander Viro
2002-09-05 15:59                     ` [RFC] intent-based lookup (was: mount flag "direct") Andreas Dilger
2002-09-03 23:24     ` (fwd) Re: [RFC] mount flag "direct" David Lang
2002-09-04  4:27   ` Kevin O'Connor
2002-09-03 23:05 ` David Lang
     [not found] <02Sep6.161154edt.62237@gpu.utcc.utoronto.ca>
2002-09-07 13:36 ` Peter T. Breuer
     [not found] <20020909181724.GA31153@ravel.coda.cs.cmu.edu>
2002-09-09 18:58 ` Peter T. Breuer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020904144909.Z6228@vestdata.no \
    --to=kernel@ragnark.vestdata.no \
    --cc=aia21@cantab.net \
    --cc=david.lang@digitalinsight.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ptb@it.uc3m.es \
    --cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
    --cc=xavier.bestel@free.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.