All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Drokin <green@namesys.com>
To: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>
Cc: szepe@pinerecords.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	reiserfs-dev@namesys.com
Subject: Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: [PATCH] sparc32: wrong type of nlink_t
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 21:25:45 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020905212545.A5349@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1031244334.1684.264.camel@tiny>

Hello!

On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 12:45:34PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> > > read the -noleaf description on the find man page to see why we need to
> > > set the directory link count to 1 when we are lying to userspace about
> > > the actual link count on directories. 
> > 
> > There is nothing about nlink == 1 means assume -noleaf, so it should not work
> > with old way too, right? Have anybody verified? ;)
> I remember that happening during the initial discussions for the link
> patch.  1 was chosen as the best way to do it, since it was a flag to
> various programs that the unix directory link convention was not being
> followed.
> > Actually patch might be easily modified to represent i_nlink == 1 for
> > large directories, but still maintain correct on-disk nlink count.
> Right.

Ok, I will come up with revised patch tomorrow and do 2.5 port (and
advise Vitaly about reiserfsck part)

Bye,
    Oleg

  reply	other threads:[~2002-09-05 17:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-01  8:55 [PATCH] sparc32: wrong type of nlink_t Tomas Szepe
2002-09-01  8:52 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-01  9:44   ` Tomas Szepe
2002-09-04 20:18     ` Dave Kleikamp
2002-09-04 20:29       ` [reiserfs-dev] " Chris Mason
2002-09-04 23:34         ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06  8:52           ` David Woodhouse
2002-09-04 20:31       ` Hans Reiser
2002-09-04 21:18         ` Tomas Szepe
2002-09-04 21:44           ` Thunder from the hill
2002-09-04 21:57             ` Thunder from the hill
2002-09-04 23:35         ` David S. Miller
2002-09-05  0:36           ` Hans Reiser
2002-09-05  0:32             ` David S. Miller
2002-09-05  0:49             ` Chris Mason
2002-09-05  5:40               ` Tomas Szepe
2002-09-05  5:36                 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-05  5:48                   ` Tomas Szepe
2002-09-05  5:45                     ` David S. Miller
2002-09-05  9:46                       ` Nikita Danilov
2002-09-05  5:56                     ` Oleg Drokin
2002-09-05  5:52                       ` David S. Miller
2002-09-05  6:07                         ` Oleg Drokin
2002-09-05  5:59                       ` Tomas Szepe
2002-09-05  9:54                   ` Oleg Drokin
2002-09-05 10:50                     ` David S. Miller
2002-09-05 13:49                     ` Oleg Drokin
2002-09-05 13:57                       ` Oleg Drokin
2002-09-05 14:03                       ` Chris Mason
2002-09-05 14:17                         ` Oleg Drokin
2002-09-05 16:45                           ` Chris Mason
2002-09-05 17:25                             ` Oleg Drokin [this message]
2002-09-05 21:18                               ` jw schultz
2002-09-05 22:02                                 ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2002-09-05 22:57                                   ` jw schultz
2002-09-06  0:01                                     ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2002-09-06  1:41                                       ` jw schultz
2002-09-06  2:29                                         ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2002-09-05 16:09                     ` Dave Kleikamp
2002-09-05 16:13                       ` Oleg Drokin
2002-09-05 17:58                         ` Dave Kleikamp
2002-09-06 13:54                           ` Oleg Drokin
2002-09-05 17:24                     ` Linus Torvalds
2002-09-04 23:33       ` David S. Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020905212545.A5349@namesys.com \
    --to=green@namesys.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mason@suse.com \
    --cc=reiserfs-dev@namesys.com \
    --cc=szepe@pinerecords.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.