From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lyle Seaman Subject: Re: Runlevel for Sleep? Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2002 13:32:43 -0400 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20020907173248.374CF1480A@o-o.yi.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: Message from Pavel Machek of "Fri, 06 Sep 2002 12:21:54 -0000." <20020906122153.F39-muQmgwBScQHrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org > umounting nfs seems like good idea, and no ammount of drivers will fix that. Can't unmount it if there are open files. I don't agree that unmounting NFS is necessarily a good idea -- I want everything to resume exactly the way it was suspended to the greatest extent possible. If the server has gone away and returned, well, that can't be helped. But otherwise, I would expect all my network resources to be in the same state as I left them, just as with my local resources. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390