All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: phil@netroedge.com (phil@netroedge.com)
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: lm_sensors
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 06:23:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020909102519.D16408@Stimpy.netroedge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF0351D9C0.5474FFE2-ON87256C2B.005D8AC8@boulder.ibm.com>


On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 11:18:44AM +0300, Ky?sti M?lkki wrote:
>[...]
> 
> However I do not consider current situation very satisfactory:
> 
> 1. Blacklisting by DMI data does not catch new models beforehand.

Pam claims all current and future models will not use this chip (at 
least on Thinkpads).
 
> 2. IBM systems with other than PIIX4 are compromised if admin does not
> run and/or believe sensors-detect warnings and is unaware of the issue.

Yes, there are still configurations which exist which make it possible 
for this problem to crop up again.  I worry particularly about other 
chips which may react negatively to probing.

> 3. If #1 or #2 happens, every existing client driver probing around
> 0x54-0x57 needs a workaround. Including video4linux(2) drivers from
> several sources, and any app using the char device.
>
> I think patching i2c-core to add extra Write Quick within the critical
> section is safe and easy way to handle those issues. This leaves only
> multi-master topologies vulnerable. What do the SMBus specs say, can a
> laptop share SMBus with a docking station, charger etc ?

I'm wary of changing the code at quite that low of a level.  I think 
it's good we tweaked sensors-detect to do what it can to work around 
the issue.  It's also nice to have the blacklist in effect as a 
temporary measure until testing is completed.

Past that, I think we should stay out of most kernel code (with
exception to the blacklisting code).  What we most definitely do not
want to do is change the operation of the code to make it work in an
unexpected way for developers (e.g. having quick writes get duplicated 
for certain addresses and such).

It's a balance between practicality and technical 'correctness'.  I'd
like to keep things as technically correct as possible.  If a chip or
mobo has a broken design, then it's the problem of the manufacturer.  
In practicality, it is nessesary for us to do what we can to make it
safe for users, but I don't want to move away from having the code
work as expected simply to work around someone else's broken hardware
design.


Phil

-- 
Philip Edelbrock -- IS Manager -- Edge Design, Corvallis, OR
   phil@netroedge.com -- http://www.netroedge.com/~phil
 PGP F16: 01 D2 FD 01 B5 46 F4 F0  3A 8B 9D 7E 14 7F FB 7A

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-05-19  6:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-19  6:23 lm_sensors Pam Huntley
2005-05-19  6:23 ` lm_sensors phil
2005-05-19  6:23 ` lm_sensors Mark D. Studebaker
2005-05-19  6:23 ` phil [this message]
2005-05-19  6:23 ` lm_sensors Kyösti Mälkki
2005-05-19  6:23 ` lm_sensors phil
2005-05-19  6:23 ` lm_sensors Mark D. Studebaker
2005-05-19  6:23 ` lm_sensors Mark Studebaker
2005-05-19  6:23 ` lm_sensors Mark D. Studebaker
2005-05-19  6:23 ` lm_sensors phil
2005-05-19  6:23 ` lm_sensors Kyösti Mälkki
2005-05-19  6:23 ` lm_sensors DB Troll
2005-05-19  6:23 ` lm_sensors Albert Kaan
2005-05-19  6:23 ` lm_sensors Jani Partanen
2005-05-19  6:24 ` lm_sensors Jean Delvare
2005-05-19  6:24 ` lm_sensors Jean Delvare
2005-05-19  6:24 ` lm_sensors Dimitri Kouznetsov
2005-05-19  6:24 ` Lm_sensors Axel Thimm
2005-05-19  6:24 ` Lm_sensors Jean Delvare
2005-05-19  6:25 ` lm_sensors Jean Delvare
2005-05-19  6:25 ` lm_sensors Shue David R Contr AFRL/IFTC
2005-05-19  6:25 ` lm_sensors Jean Delvare
2005-05-19  6:25 ` lm_sensors Jean Delvare
2005-05-19  6:25 ` lm_sensors Jean Delvare
2005-05-19  6:25 ` lm_sensors Jean Delvare
2005-05-19  6:25 ` lm_sensors Jean Delvare
2005-05-21 19:26 ` [lm-sensors] lm_sensors Jean Delvare
2005-05-23 15:14 ` [lm-sensors] lm_sensors Jean Delvare
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-04-23  6:46 lm_sensors Satya Swaroop Damarla
2005-05-19  6:23 [ltp] lm sensors Dean L. Hedin
2005-05-19  6:23 ` phil
2005-05-19  6:23 ` Pam Huntley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020909102519.D16408@Stimpy.netroedge.com \
    --to=phil@netroedge.com \
    --cc=lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.