From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guillaume Morin Subject: Re: "unclean" ?bug? with dell dns Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 22:40:32 +0200 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20020909204032.GA18977@morinfr.org> References: <20020827025542.A15684@yannick.lesaint> <20020828132419.GC21410@morinfr.org> <200209091948.1734@ellinger.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200209091948.1734@ellinger.de> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: Rainer Ellinger Cc: Yannick Le Saint , netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Hi Rainer, Dans un message du 09 sep =E0 20:27, Rainer Ellinger =E9crivait : > investigation with ethereal showed that matching pakets had their udp=20 > crc set to 0x0000. My questions are:=20 >=20 > Should this condition really considered harmful and matched by unclean? No, that's a bug. I'll submit a patch for that. > Why is there no corresponding log message from the unclean module? The consensus is that for a simple checksum error a log message is not needed.=20 Regards, --=20 Guillaume Morin Justice is lost, Justice is raped, Justice is done. (Metallica)