From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
sfkaplan@cs.amherst.edu, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] modified segq for 2.5
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 16:32:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020909233211.GI18800@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0209091953550.1857-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> Ideally some distinction would be nice, even if only to distinguish I/O
>> demanded to be done directly by the workload from background writeback
>> and/or readahead.
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 07:54:29PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> OK, are we talking about page replacement or does queue scanning
> have priority over the quality of page replacement ? ;)
This is relatively tangential. The concern expressed has more to do
with VM writeback starving workload-issued I/O than page replacement.
Cheers,
Bill
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-09 23:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-15 14:24 [PATCH] modified segq for 2.5 Rik van Riel
2002-09-09 9:38 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-09 11:40 ` Ed Tomlinson
2002-09-09 17:10 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-09 18:58 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-09 13:10 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-09 19:03 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-09 19:25 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-09 19:55 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-09 20:03 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-09 20:51 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-09 20:57 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-09 21:09 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-09 21:52 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-09 22:41 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-10 0:17 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-09 22:49 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-09 22:54 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-09 23:32 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2002-09-09 23:53 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-09 22:46 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-09 22:58 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-09 23:40 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-10 0:02 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-10 0:21 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-10 1:13 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-10 1:50 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-10 2:02 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020909233211.GI18800@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=sfkaplan@cs.amherst.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.