From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: Runlevel for Sleep? Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 19:08:36 +0200 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20020913170835.GB7096@elf.ucw.cz> References: <200209081126.g88BQjn05186@pfn1.pefnos> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200209081126.g88BQjn05186-a1J+ToZc0kR3t0M9ZKkFCQ@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: "P. Christeas" Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi! > One more thing (as Lyle Seaman has pointed out) is that sometimes we don't > want to suspend, even though the user has pressed the 'suspend > button'. This Imagine notebook running out of batteries. You don't want to completely drain batteries then crash because userspace is 100MB in swap and can not react in time. Pavel -- Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala sourceforge.net. What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email? ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf