From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Oleg Drokin <green@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: Bug in reiserfsck 3.6.1-pre1
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 11:43:10 +0400
Message-ID: <20020916114310.A10826@namesys.com>
References: <20020916025655.E22362@noris.de> <20020916091943.A5459@namesys.com> <20020916093520.C10175@noris.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-11463-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20020916093520.C10175@noris.de>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Matthias Urlichs <smurf@noris.de>
Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com

Hello!

On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 09:35:21AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:

> > Then make this file available for us to download.
> Warning: that'll be 100+ MBytes. Compressed. (The original RAID's almost
> half a terabyte.)

I don't understand where's this number from.
Metadata size exceeds 40 Megabytes pretty rarely.
Yes, I have seen metadata snapshots from 800M filesystems for example.

Bye,
    Oleg