From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Drokin Subject: Re: Copy time comparison 2.4.20-pre6 <-> 2.4.19+data-logging (was:Compatibility of current 2.4.19.pending ...) Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 10:33:21 +0400 Message-ID: <20020917103321.C25766@namesys.com> References: <3D7FDEA5.7040806@mb.tu-ilmenau.de> <3D81076E.6090408@mb.tu-ilmenau.de> <20020913113735.A6022@namesys.com> <3D826FB9.7030909@mb.tu-ilmenau.de> <20020914130239.D26664@namesys.com> <3D867C14.5060404@mb.tu-ilmenau.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D867C14.5060404@mb.tu-ilmenau.de> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Manuel Krause Cc: Andrea Arcangeli , reiserfs-list@namesys.com Hello! On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 02:49:24AM +0200, Manuel Krause wrote: > >What tool do you use for backup? > Hey, Oleg, you should know this; I stayed with my simple but useful > scripts using "cp -ax A/. B/" for testing reiserfs performance on this > command related to my reiserfs partitions' content. That content is not I am just making sure. > >Also very huge difference is seen when creating holes ;) > >e.g compare time of seeking to 128Gb and writing one byte between > >2.4.20-pre7 and 2.4.20-pre6 ;) > >Code for that was once posted on our mailing list. > >When you will feel that 2.4.20-pre7 hanged, don't trust that feeling > >and wait till the end of operation. ;) > You're kind of joking?! "time " should show the total lack of > time related performance, when [throughput] is divided by [time] or I must be missing something, but why do you want to divide throughput by time? throughput is amount of data divided by time. > not?! I calculated these values manually based upon the timings & df > values after copying. Yes, I want to show my personal engagement for the > reiserfs community, too. Hm. Are you sure you are hitting write-speed limit? May be you are read-speed bounded? Can you please check that? Thank you. Bye, Oleg