From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: 2.5.34? Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 15:49:15 +0000 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20020917154914.E39@toy.ucw.cz> References: <200209161130.g8GBUo024143@p2.parker.boston.ma.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200209161130.g8GBUo024143-paYRYfI9b/YMuHHiPFXXZ1fOaUvyCJUZ@public.gmane.org>; from brad-2nKKSigPee+ibv+y4V69FXNtEUiqdi9I@public.gmane.org on Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 07:30:50AM -0400 Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Brad Parker Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri , acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi! > Can anyone provide a coherent description of the S3 support in 2.5.34? > Is it close? does it need patches (like the one above?) It worked before. IDE support is recommended, through. > I'm willing to put some work into it but I'd benefit from whom ever is > closest to it giving a quick status. > > It seems like if S4 can be made to work, S3 should be straightforward > (heh). If tried it in a stock 2.5.34 and found no difference from the > 2.2.x acpi patched kernels I use... S3 is not as simple as you think, but as it worked before... It should be easy. Pavel -- Philips Velo 1: 1"x4"x8", 300gram, 60, 12MB, 40bogomips, linux, mutt, details at http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/velo/index.html. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: AMD - Your access to the experts on Hammer Technology! Open Source & Linux Developers, register now for the AMD Developer Symposium. Code: EX8664 http://www.developwithamd.com/developerlab