From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@sgi.com>
To: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-aio@kvack.org, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: libaio 0.3.92 test release
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 14:25:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020917212544.GA1537314@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020916221219.A22465@redhat.com>
On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 10:12:19PM -0400, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> I've just uploaded the libaio 0.3.92 test release to kernel.org. Most
> notably, this release passes a few basic tests on ia64, and should work
> on x86-64 too (but isn't tested).
Thanks Ben. I just pulled down the latest patch and library and tried
them out on my ia64 box. Many of the tests in the testsuite passed,
but I encountered a hang during 'make check' after 6.t ran. Here's
the output up to that point:
[root@ainek1 harness]# make check
rm -f testdir/rofile
echo "test" >testdir/rofile
chmod 400 testdir/rofile
rm -f testdir/rwfile
echo "test" >testdir/rwfile
chmod 600 testdir/rwfile
rm -f testdir/wofile
echo "test" >testdir/wofile
chmod 200 testdir/wofile
./runtests.sh cases/2.p cases/3.p cases/4.p cases/5.p cases/6.p cases/7.p cases/8.p cases/10.p cases/11.p cases/12.p cases/13.p
Test run starting at Tue Sep 17 13:31:24 PDT 2002
Starting cases/2.p
expect -14: io_setup(-1000, 0xffffffffc0010000) = -14 [Bad address]
expect -14: io_setup( 1000, 0xffffffffc0010000) = -14 [Bad address]
expect -14: io_setup( 0, 0xffffffffc0010000) = -14 [Bad address]
expect -22: io_setup(-1000, 0x60000fffffffb990) = -22 [Invalid argument]
expect -22: io_setup( -1, 0x60000fffffffb990) = -22 [Invalid argument]
expect -22: io_setup( 0, 0x60000fffffffb990) = -22 [Invalid argument]
expect 0: io_setup( 1, 0x60000fffffffb990) = 0 [Success]
expect -22: io_setup( 1, 0x60000fffffffb990) = -22 [Invalid argument]
test cases/2.t completed PASSED.
Completed cases/2.p with 0.
Starting cases/3.p
expect -22: io_submit(0xffffffffffffffff, 1, 0x60000fffffffb960) = -22 [Invalid argument]
expect 0: io_submit(0x2000000000044000, 0, 0x60000fffffffb960) = 0 [Success]
expect -14: io_submit(0x2000000000044000, 1, (nil)) = -14 [Bad address]
expect -14: io_submit(0x2000000000044000, 1, 0xffffffffffffffff) = -14 [Bad address]
expect -14: io_submit(0x2000000000044000, 2, 0x60000fffffffb970) = -14 [Bad address]
expect -14: io_submit(0x2000000000044000, 2, 0x60000fffffffb980) = -14 [Bad address]
expect -22: io_submit(0x2000000000044000, -1, 0x60000fffffffb960) = -22 [Invalid argument]
test cases/3.t completed PASSED.
Completed cases/3.p with 0.
Starting cases/4.p
expect -9: (w), res = sync_submit: io_submit res=-9 [Bad file descriptor]
-9 [Bad file descriptor]
expect -9: (r), res = sync_submit: io_submit res=-9 [Bad file descriptor]
-9 [Bad file descriptor]
expect 512: (w), res = 512 [Success]
expect 512: (r), res = 512 [Success]
expect -22: (r), res = -22 [Invalid argument]
expect -22: (w), res = -22 [Invalid argument]
expect 0: (r), res = 0 [Success]
expect 4: (w), res = 4 [Success]
expect 4: (w), res = 4 [Success]
expect 8: (r), res = 8 [Success]
read after append: [12345678]
expect -14: (r), res = -14 [Bad address]
expect -14: (w), res = -14 [Bad address]
expect -14: (w), res = 512 [Success] -- FAILED
test cases/4.t completed FAILED.
Completed cases/4.p with 1 -- FAILED.
Starting cases/5.p
expect 512: (w), res = 512 [Success]
expect 512: (r), res = 512 [Success]
expect 512: (r), res = 512 [Success]
expect 512: (w), res = 512 [Success]
expect 512: (w), res = 512 [Success]
expect -14: (r), res = -14 [Bad address]
expect 512: (r), res = -14 [Bad address] -- FAILED
expect -14: (w), res = -14 [Bad address]
test cases/5.t completed FAILED.
Completed cases/5.p with 1 -- FAILED.
Starting cases/6.p
size = 953648
expect 805306368: (w), res = 805306368 [Success]
expect 805306368: (r), res = sync_submit: io_getevents res=0 [Success]
0 [Success] -- FAILED
test cases/6.t completed FAILED.
Unfortunately, I don't have kdb compiled into this kernel so I can't
give you a backtrace right now, but maybe you've already run into this
problem?
Thanks,
Jesse
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-17 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-17 2:12 libaio 0.3.92 test release Benjamin LaHaise
2002-09-17 17:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2002-09-17 21:25 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-09-17 19:31 Chen, Kenneth W
2002-09-17 19:38 ` Benjamin LaHaise
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020917212544.GA1537314@sgi.com \
--to=jbarnes@sgi.com \
--cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.