From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Toon van der Pas Subject: Re: 2.5.34? Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 18:38:19 +0200 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20020918183819.A10275@vdpas.hobby.nl> References: <20020916001425.82756.qmail@web20906.mail.yahoo.com> <20020916012506.G10583@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20020916081909.A25876@vdpas.hobby.nl> <20020917154653.C39@toy.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020917154653.C39-muQmgwBScQHrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>; from pavel-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org on Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 03:46:53PM +0000 Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 03:46:53PM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote: >=20 > > > > Is 2.5.34 patch comming out soon? > > >=20 > > > i don't particularly see the point in releasing one since all ACPI = patches > > > for 2.5 that i'm aware of are integrated into the current bitkeeper= tree. > > > you could grab a nightly snapshot if you can't wait for 2.5.35: > > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jgarzik/snap/2.5/patc= h-2.5.34-bk6.bz2 > >=20 > > But be aware that the swsusp patch in the IDE driver in de 2.5 kernel > > was lost when Martin Dalecki's IDE project was removed! > > I would wait for it to return in some form or another, if I where you. >=20 > Look at l-k, I already submitted IDE swsusp support to Andre. I know. I got my information from your postings on the linux-kernel mailing list.= =20 My only intention was to warn people that their data is NOT safe when using swsusp with recent 2.5 kernels. I should have added that you already submitted a patch on the linux-kernel mailing list. Sorry about that. BTW: From your discussion with Andr=E9 Hedrick I understood that there still is some disagreement about the layer where the I/O to the IDE block devices should be blocked by swsusp. Is this resolved now? Regards, Toon. --=20 /"\ | \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN | "Who is this General Failure, and X AGAINST HTML MAIL | what is he doing on my harddisk?" / \ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: AMD - Your access to the experts on Hammer Technology! Open Source & Linux Developers, register now for the AMD Developer Symposium. Code: EX8664 http://www.developwithamd.com/developerlab