From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Surda Subject: Re: [PATCH] flow statistic match Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 11:34:47 +0200 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20020919093447.GE6530@noir.cb.ac.at> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dFWYt1i2NyOo1oI9" Return-path: To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org --dFWYt1i2NyOo1oI9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 11:44:38PM -0700, Jay Schulist wrote: > Hello Harald, > Here is a new match which adds per tuple packet and byte statistics along > with allowing the user to match on the number of bytes and packets for a > flow. This is uber-cool. I already see a very nice example of use: I mark the packets in mangle to achieve different priority later with the prio qdisc. Currently I mainly use --dport, but with this I can easily mark downloads (= and uploads) lower priority (e.g. >100kiB -> set lower priority, >5MiB -> set y= et lower priority). I'll follow the development and when it makes into patch-o-matic I'll build= a new kernel and try it out. =20 > Thanks, Thnx as well :-) > jay-s. Bye, Peter Surda (Shurdeek) , ICQ 10236103, +436505= 122023 -- 0 and 1. Now what could be so hard about that? --dFWYt1i2NyOo1oI9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9iZo3zogxsPZwLzcRApUKAKCWibo8ijIeObTNmGy0fJDGCWbjWwCfbFQB VyyoqssN5VDuIf20BHArY+s= =9YTI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dFWYt1i2NyOo1oI9--