From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Heinz J . Mauelshagen" Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Help! unable to mount lv's - can't see why! Message-ID: <20020919155047.B1017@sistina.com> References: <00cd01c25f0c$2990ffd0$1c01a8c0@internal.tripnet.int> <00f001c25f1b$3a24ef50$1c01a8c0@internal.tripnet.int> <20020918155938.A28041@sistina.com> <011401c25f21$b15f7da0$1c01a8c0@internal.tripnet.int> <20020919120453.C32578@sistina.com> <020301c25fca$239f7340$1c01a8c0@internal.tripnet.int> Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <020301c25fca$239f7340$1c01a8c0@internal.tripnet.int>; from red@tripany.com on Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 12:45:47PM +0200 Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 19 08:55:12 2002 List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@sistina.com On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 12:45:47PM +0200, Robin Edgar - Tripany wrote: > Fair enough, but I would very much like to access the files and determine > later what has errors and what doesn't - at the moment, I can only do this > with the docu lv and none of the others... > > You were right, I did manage to get a whole load of lost+found entries using > fsck after the mount. The docu entry was on the physical extent though, and > seems to be working fine. > Anyway I thought I'd upgrade LVM to 1.0.5 from 1.0.1 and refit the disks to > the 'old' configuration (4 disks + 1 for backup), to do a pvmove. > Now when I do a pvscan, it finds all the disks, but also the disk I did the > dd to, as part of the vg. So I de-activated the vg, and tried to reduce the > vg /dev/hdb1, hoiwever this is not working: > > # vgreduce tripserv_vol /dev/hdb1 > vgreduce -- ERROR: can't reduce volume group "tripserv_vol" by used physical > volume "/dev/hdb1" Well, LVM still has allocated extents on that PV. You can just remove empty PVs from a VG. > > # pvscan -v > pvscan -- reading all physical volumes (this may take a while...) > pvscan -- walking through all physical volumes found > pvscan -- ACTIVE PV "/dev/hdg1" of VG "tripserv_vol" [38.16 GB / 7.93 GB > free] > pvscan -- ACTIVE PV "/dev/hdh1" of VG "tripserv_vol" [38.16 GB / 8.01 GB > free] > pvscan -- inactive PV "/dev/hde1" of VG "tripserv_vol" [55.91 GB / 0 free] > pvscan -- ACTIVE PV "/dev/hdf1" of VG "tripserv_vol" [55.91 GB / 3.37 GB > free] > pvscan -- ACTIVE PV "/dev/hdb1" of VG "tripserv_vol" [55.91 GB / 0 free] > pvscan -- total: 5 [244.08 GB] / in use: 5 [244.08 GB] / in no VG: 0 [0] > > If i vgchange -a n it will deactivate them all, but then I get: > # vgreduce tripserv_vol /dev/hdb1 > vgreduce -- ERROR: volume group "tripserv_vol" is not active Doesn't change the situation, because the PV still has extents allocated. A PV must be empty and the VG active in order to remove it from the VG. > > After I restore the vg to it's 'old' configuration, I want to empty > /dev/hdb1 and add it to the volume group. Then doing a pvmove -i /dev/hde1 > should move all the data it can find there to the rest of the vg shouldn't > it? Yes, presuming that you've got enought space to fit all extents allocated to /dev/hde1. > > Thank you for all your help so far, You're welcome. Regards, Heinz -- The LVM Guy -- > Robin Edgar > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Heinz J . Mauelshagen" > To: > Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 12:04 PM > Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Help! unable to mount lv's - can't see why! > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 04:42:54PM +0200, Robin Edgar - Tripany wrote: > > > Doing the lvdisplay -v shows that pv /dev/hde1 had bits of all of the > lv's > > > on it (including the docu lv, which I *can* mount). > > > > Then it is most likely, that all filesystems will have errors. > > > > Regards, > > Heinz -- The LVM Guy -- > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Heinz J . Mauelshagen" > > > To: > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 3:59 PM > > > Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Help! unable to mount lv's - can't see why! > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 03:56:36PM +0200, Robin Edgar - Tripany wrote: > > > > > I've discovered that there is a problem with /all/ the superblocks > > > except for those of the /docu lv (see below). It does lead me to another > > > question though - only one of the HDs crashed: is it possible that LVM > wrote > > > all the superblocks on 1 HD?! If so this seems like a pretty serious bug > in > > > > > > linux-lvm mailing list > > > > linux-lvm@sistina.com > > > > http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm > > > > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > linux-lvm mailing list > > > linux-lvm@sistina.com > > > http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm > > > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html > > > > *** Software bugs are stupid. > > Nevertheless it needs not so stupid people to solve them *** > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > linux-lvm mailing list > > linux-lvm@sistina.com > > http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm > > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-lvm mailing list > linux-lvm@sistina.com > http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html *** Software bugs are stupid. Nevertheless it needs not so stupid people to solve them *** =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Heinz Mauelshagen Sistina Software Inc. Senior Consultant/Developer Am Sonnenhang 11 56242 Marienrachdorf Germany Mauelshagen@Sistina.com +49 2626 141200 FAX 924446 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-