From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Cc: Hanna Linder <hannal@us.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@math.psu.edu
Subject: Re: 2.5.36-mm1 dbench 512 profiles
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 22:14:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020920051455.GI3530@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D8A5FE6.4C5DE189@digeo.com>
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 04:38:14PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> It would be interesting to know the context switch rate
> during this test, and to see what things look like with HZ=100.
Ow! Throughput went down by something like 25% by just bumping HZ down
to 100. (or so it appears)
One of the odd things here is that this is absolutely not being allowed
to sample times when the test is not running. So default_idle is some
kind of actual scheduling artifact, though I'm not entirely sure when
it's sitting idle. It may just be the most predominant sampled thing
within the kernel despite 98% non-idle system time and HZ == 1000 is not
the issue. Not sure.
Cheers,
Bill
Out-of-line lock version:
c01053a4 20974286 42.2901 default_idle
c015c586 5759482 11.6127 .text.lock.dcache
c0154b43 5747223 11.588 .text.lock.namei
c01317e4 4653534 9.38284 generic_file_write_nolock
c0130d00 1861383 3.75308 file_read_actor
c0114a98 1230049 2.48013 load_balance
c019f6bb 866076 1.74625 .text.lock.dec_and_lock
c01066a8 796042 1.60505 .text.lock.semaphore
c013f7fc 749976 1.51216 blk_queue_bounce
c019f640 497122 1.00234 atomic_dec_and_lock
c0114f10 321897 0.649036 scheduler_tick
c0152378 262290 0.528851 path_lookup
c0144dc0 223189 0.450012 generic_file_llseek
c015adf0 207285 0.417945 prune_dcache
c011748d 185193 0.373402 .text.lock.sched
c0115258 184852 0.372714 do_schedule
c0114628 171719 0.346234 try_to_wake_up
c013676c 170725 0.34423 .text.lock.slab
c013faa4 143586 0.28951 .text.lock.highmem
c01062dc 142571 0.287464 __down
c015ba1c 140737 0.283766 d_lookup
c014675c 130760 0.263649 __fput
c0152a30 126688 0.255439 open_namei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-20 5:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-19 22:30 2.5.36-mm1 dbench 512 profiles William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-19 23:18 ` Hanna Linder
2002-09-19 23:38 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-19 23:45 ` Hanna Linder
2002-09-20 0:08 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-20 4:02 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-20 7:59 ` Maneesh Soni
2002-09-20 8:06 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-20 12:03 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-20 18:51 ` Hanna Linder
2002-09-20 20:32 ` Hanna Linder
2002-09-20 20:54 ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-09-20 20:39 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-20 21:30 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-20 23:11 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-20 23:22 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-21 7:52 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-20 14:34 ` Dave Hansen
2002-09-20 16:07 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-20 17:48 ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-09-20 17:40 ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-09-20 20:28 ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-09-20 5:14 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2002-09-20 6:59 ` William Lee Irwin III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020920051455.GI3530@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=hannal@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.