From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from systemhalted (CPE0080c82c70ca.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [24.112.224.149]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA424829 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 13:49:28 -0600 (MDT) Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 15:48:20 -0400 From: Carlos O'Donell To: Istvan Gyenes Cc: Grant Grundler , parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] SMP kernel problems on a D350 Message-ID: <20020920194820.GC24622@systemhalted> References: <20020919224609.DF1314829@dsl2.external.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: > Thanks I'll try that! > > Another question: If 2.4.19 SMP not enough stable where can I find the > latest stable smp kernel source? > > Thanks, > > Steve Nothing up this sleeve, nothing up this sleeve... Tada! ;) I'm not quite certain that we ever had a stable SMP kernel. While an older kernel might seem to give you SMP stability, it does so at the cost of speed and the introduction of old bugs. If you can find some test cases for Non-SMP vs. SMP stability, then we'll be a step in the right direction. c.