From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: phillips@arcor.de
Cc: davidm@hpl.hp.com, davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com, dmo@osdl.org,
axboe@suse.de, _deepfire@mail.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: DAC960 in 2.5.38, with new changes
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 13:54:47 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020923.135447.24672280.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E17ta3t-0003bj-00@starship>
From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 22:44:08 +0200
On Monday 23 September 2002 21:19, David Mosberger wrote:
> This looks like a porting-nightmare in the making. There's got to be a
> better way to determine whether you need a writeq() vs. a writel().
Even if an #ifdef is necessary here (and we are in trouble if it is) it
should not trigger on __ia64__, it should trigger on the size of (long).
There is nothing preventing a 32-bit long platform from being able
to store 64-bits at once to PCI space.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-23 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-23 19:04 DAC960 in 2.5.38, with new changes Dave Olien
2002-09-23 19:19 ` David Mosberger
2002-09-23 20:40 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-23 20:53 ` David Mosberger
2002-09-23 20:57 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-23 21:24 ` David Mosberger
2002-09-23 21:17 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-23 21:32 ` David Mosberger
2002-09-23 21:28 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-23 21:31 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-23 21:33 ` David Mosberger
2002-09-23 21:28 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-23 21:40 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-23 21:45 ` David Mosberger
2002-09-23 20:44 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-23 20:54 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2002-09-24 16:54 ` Dave Olien
2002-09-24 17:11 ` David Mosberger
2002-09-24 17:28 ` Dave Olien
2002-09-24 18:21 ` David Mosberger
2002-09-24 18:25 ` Dave Olien
2002-09-24 19:12 ` David Mosberger
2002-09-24 18:45 ` Dave Olien
2002-09-24 17:50 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-24 18:27 ` David Mosberger
2002-09-24 17:39 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-25 22:20 ` DAC960, documentation links Daniel Phillips
2002-09-25 22:23 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-26 0:02 ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
2002-09-26 16:13 ` DAC960 in 2.5.38, with new changes Alan Cox
2002-09-24 17:45 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-25 21:42 ` davide.rossetti
2002-09-23 20:39 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-23 21:41 ` Dave Olien
2002-09-23 21:53 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-23 22:03 ` Dave Olien
2002-09-23 22:22 ` Daniel Phillips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020923.135447.24672280.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=_deepfire@mail.ru \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--cc=dmo@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phillips@arcor.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.