* 2.5.38 vs. 2.5.38-mm1 dbench 512 oprofiles
@ 2002-09-23 5:36 William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-23 5:46 ` William Lee Irwin III
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: William Lee Irwin III @ 2002-09-23 5:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
2.5.38 virgin:
Throughput 34.0847 MB/sec (NB=42.6059 MB/sec 340.847 MBit/sec) 512 procs
c01053ec 332946298 89.2647 poll_idle
c0114a48 11069332 2.96775 load_balance
c015c196 6290235 1.68645 .text.lock.dcache
c0154783 4966046 1.33142 .text.lock.namei
c0114ec0 3330213 0.892848 scheduler_tick
c0131e94 2213627 0.593485 generic_file_write_nolock
c01a10cb 2120138 0.568421 .text.lock.dec_and_lock
c011734d 1064379 0.285366 .text.lock.sched
c0111728 777966 0.208577 smp_apic_timer_interrupt
c0131460 485556 0.13018 file_read_actor
c013f950 439352 0.117793 blk_queue_bounce
c0106418 417379 0.111902 .text.lock.semaphore
c010604c 327813 0.0878884 __down
c01145b8 312618 0.0838146 try_to_wake_up
c01a1050 282950 0.0758604 atomic_dec_and_lock
c01151e4 280517 0.0752081 do_schedule
c0151fb8 233523 0.0626088 path_lookup
c01513f4 204300 0.0547739 link_path_walk
c01449a0 197412 0.0529272 generic_file_llseek
c015b120 186943 0.0501204 d_alloc
c015b2e4 173003 0.046383 d_instantiate
c013fbf6 158793 0.0425733 .text.lock.highmem
c0130e08 150974 0.040477 find_get_page
2.5.38-mm1:
Throughput 20.966 MB/sec (NB=26.2075 MB/sec 209.66 MBit/sec) 512 procs
c01053ec 332946298 89.2647 poll_idle
c0114a48 11069332 2.96775 load_balance
c015c196 6290235 1.68645 .text.lock.dcache
c0154783 4966046 1.33142 .text.lock.namei
c0114ec0 3330213 0.892848 scheduler_tick
c0131e94 2213627 0.593485 generic_file_write_nolock
c01a10cb 2120138 0.568421 .text.lock.dec_and_lock
c011734d 1064379 0.285366 .text.lock.sched
c0111728 777966 0.208577 smp_apic_timer_interrupt
c0131460 485556 0.13018 file_read_actor
c013f950 439352 0.117793 blk_queue_bounce
c0106418 417379 0.111902 .text.lock.semaphore
c010604c 327813 0.0878884 __down
c01145b8 312618 0.0838146 try_to_wake_up
c01a1050 282950 0.0758604 atomic_dec_and_lock
c01151e4 280517 0.0752081 do_schedule
c0151fb8 233523 0.0626088 path_lookup
c01513f4 204300 0.0547739 link_path_walk
c01449a0 197412 0.0529272 generic_file_llseek
c015b120 186943 0.0501204 d_alloc
c015b2e4 173003 0.046383 d_instantiate
c013fbf6 158793 0.0425733 .text.lock.highmem
c0130e08 150974 0.040477 find_get_page
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.5.38 vs. 2.5.38-mm1 dbench 512 oprofiles
2002-09-23 5:36 2.5.38 vs. 2.5.38-mm1 dbench 512 oprofiles William Lee Irwin III
@ 2002-09-23 5:46 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-23 9:10 ` Dipankar Sarma
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: William Lee Irwin III @ 2002-09-23 5:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 10:36:00PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
sorry real 2.5.38-mm1 profile:
c01053dc 884615995 93.5551 poll_idle
c0114c28 38573436 4.07944 load_balance
c01150a0 7901071 0.8356 scheduler_tick
c0111788 2659487 0.281262 smp_apic_timer_interrupt
c0131600 1442967 0.152605 file_read_actor
c01402a4 1199079 0.126812 blk_queue_bounce
c01320f4 1054365 0.111507 generic_file_write_nolock
c010d718 730020 0.0772053 timer_interrupt
c01a2abb 725817 0.0767608 .text.lock.dec_and_lock
c01175fb 674730 0.071358 .text.lock.sched
c0106408 356493 0.0377019 .text.lock.semaphore
c0115454 326529 0.034533 do_schedule
c011f6f0 309224 0.0327029 do_softirq
c0122eb4 262417 0.0277527 update_one_process
c0122fe8 222659 0.0235479 timer_bh
c010603c 191642 0.0202676 __down
c0114798 159658 0.0168851 try_to_wake_up
c015c66c 153232 0.0162055 d_lookup
c0145b50 141098 0.0149222 generic_file_llseek
c01391cc 123761 0.0130887 rmqueue
c01408d1 123358 0.0130461 .text.lock.highmem
c0147160 117950 0.0124741 get_empty_filp
c0174f00 105235 0.0111294 ext2_new_block
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.5.38 vs. 2.5.38-mm1 dbench 512 oprofiles
2002-09-23 5:46 ` William Lee Irwin III
@ 2002-09-23 9:10 ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-09-23 13:50 ` William Lee Irwin III
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dipankar Sarma @ 2002-09-23 9:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: William Lee Irwin III, linux-kernel
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 06:02:15AM +0000, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 10:36:00PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> sorry real 2.5.38-mm1 profile:
> c01053dc 884615995 93.5551 poll_idle
> c0114c28 38573436 4.07944 load_balance
Any idea why scheduler time shoot up with mm1 ? The RCU core
patch (rcu_ltimer) in mm1 doesn't force any context switches, so it
can't be that.
Thanks
--
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> http://lse.sourceforge.net
Linux Technology Center, IBM Software Lab, Bangalore, India.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.5.38 vs. 2.5.38-mm1 dbench 512 oprofiles
2002-09-23 9:10 ` Dipankar Sarma
@ 2002-09-23 13:50 ` William Lee Irwin III
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: William Lee Irwin III @ 2002-09-23 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dipankar Sarma; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 06:02:15AM +0000, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> sorry real 2.5.38-mm1 profile:
>> c01053dc 884615995 93.5551 poll_idle
>> c0114c28 38573436 4.07944 load_balance
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 02:40:55PM +0530, Dipankar Sarma wrote:
> Any idea why scheduler time shoot up with mm1 ? The RCU core
> patch (rcu_ltimer) in mm1 doesn't force any context switches, so it
> can't be that.
Basically, the time once spent in busywait becomes idle time.
Cheers,
Bill
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-09-23 13:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-09-23 5:36 2.5.38 vs. 2.5.38-mm1 dbench 512 oprofiles William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-23 5:46 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-23 9:10 ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-09-23 13:50 ` William Lee Irwin III
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.