From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 23:33:57 +0200 From: Jacob Gorm Hansen Subject: Re: [Adeos-main] Re: [PATCH] Adeos nanokernel for 2.5.38 1/2: no-arch code Message-ID: <20020924213356.GA14291@domain.hid> References: <3D8E8371.D2070D87@domain.hid> <20020922045907.C35@domain.hid> <3D90D388.746D0C0D@opersys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D90D388.746D0C0D@opersys.com> Sender: adeos-main-admin@domain.hid Errors-To: adeos-main-admin@domain.hid List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Karim Yaghmour Cc: Pavel Machek , linux-kernel , Adeos , Philippe Gerum On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 05:05:12PM -0400, Karim Yaghmour wrote: > > To be honest, nothing in Adeos is "new". Adeos is implemented on > classic early '90s nanokernel research. I've listed a number of > nanokernel papers in the paper I wrote on Adeos. A complete list > of nanokernel papers would probably have hundreds of entries. > Some of these nanokernels even had OS schedulers (exokernel for > instance). All Adeos implements is a scheme for sharing the > interrupts among the various OSes using an interrupt pipeline. Hi, are you planning to add spaces & portals, like in Space or Pebble? best, Jacob