From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Kai Germaschewski <kai-germaschewski@uiowa.edu>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>,
Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@Dell.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] x86 BIOS Enhanced Disk Device (EDD) polling
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 19:27:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020929192758.D15924@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209291315010.28578-100000@chaos.physics.uiowa.edu>; from kai-germaschewski@uiowa.edu on Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 01:20:44PM -0500
On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 01:20:44PM -0500, Kai Germaschewski wrote:
> Let me add that there are currently two places where arch specific drivers
> appear, eg:
>
> arch/{cris,um}/drivers/
> and
> drivers/{s390,macintosh,acorn}/
>
> I think it'd be nice to decide on one way or the other. The first place
> has the advantage of putting all arch-specific stuff into one place, the
> second one makes it (IMO) cleaner to share drivers between e.g. s390 and
> s390x, or possibly i386/x86_64 in the future.
The ARM port used to have arch/arm/drivers/{block,char,net,sound} but
this was decried by _other_ people in the ARM community to be too
painful, and I was literally hounded into moving them into drivers.
I don't want to go back to arch/arm/drivers now, thanks.
--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-29 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20BF5713E14D5B48AA289F72BD372D6821CE34@AUSXMPC122.aus.amer.dell.com>
2002-09-27 21:30 ` [RFC][PATCH] x86 BIOS Enhanced Disk Device (EDD) polling Matt Domsch
2002-09-27 22:33 ` Greg KH
2002-09-29 16:11 ` Dave Jones
2002-09-29 16:18 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-09-29 16:44 ` Alan Cox
2002-09-29 18:20 ` Kai Germaschewski
2002-09-29 18:27 ` Russell King [this message]
2002-09-29 18:52 ` Dave Jones
2002-10-01 1:55 ` Patrick Mochel
2002-10-01 3:37 Matt_Domsch
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-09-30 4:32 Matt_Domsch
2002-09-11 19:09 Matt_Domsch
2002-09-12 18:00 ` Patrick Mochel
2002-09-12 18:48 ` Matt Domsch
2002-09-10 22:43 Matt_Domsch
2002-09-09 1:17 Matt_Domsch
2002-09-04 0:54 Matt_Domsch
2002-09-04 1:09 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-04 4:17 ` Greg KH
2002-09-08 0:39 ` Patrick Mochel
2002-09-03 22:05 Matt Domsch
2002-09-03 23:29 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-04 4:35 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-09-04 16:02 ` Matt Domsch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020929192758.D15924@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=Matt_Domsch@Dell.com \
--cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=kai-germaschewski@uiowa.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.