From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 13:12:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 13:10:46 -0400 Received: from mnh-1-06.mv.com ([207.22.10.38]:23301 "EHLO ccure.karaya.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 13:10:35 -0400 Message-Id: <200210011819.NAA02853@ccure.karaya.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 To: Oleg Drokin cc: James Stevenson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.5.39 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 01 Oct 2002 11:44:54 +0400." <20021001114454.A27039@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 13:19:36 -0500 From: Jeff Dike Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org green@namesys.com said: > Here's what I need to apply before I can build bk-current with UML > support. Applied, thanks. > And then kernel mode fault at 0x5a5a5a5e Can you get a stack trace from that crash? > Just before the crash it warns about winch_interrupt : read failed, > errno = 9 fd 57 is losing SIGWINCH support This looks different. Is it consistently the same file descriptor? If so, put a breakpoint on close and see who's closing it who isn't supposed to. > @@ -863,6 +863,7 @@ > return(-EFAULT); > return(0); > } > + return -ENOTTY; > } I did a check of some of the other block drivers, and they mostly seem to do -EINVAL rather than -ENOTTY. There was an oddball -ENOSYS, but I guess I'll stick with -EINVAL. Jeff