From: "J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] nptl 0.2
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:10:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021004151054.GA1752@werewolf.able.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D9D51A3.3050906@redhat.com>; from drepper@redhat.com on Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 10:30:27 +0200
On 2002.10.04 Ulrich Drepper wrote:
>
>Now that the Linux kernel is once again able to run all the tests we
>have and since glibc 2.3 was released it was time for a new code drop.
>I've uploaded the second code drop for the Native POSIX Thread
>Library:
>
> ftp://people.redhat.com/drepper/nptl/nptl-0.2.tar.bz2
>
Fine !!
>You need
This is the hard part...
>
>- - the latest of Linus' kernel from BitKeeper (or 2.5.41 when it
> is released);
>
Mmmm...
>- - glibc 2.3
>
Easy. I suppose it is binary compatible with 2.2.5.
>- - the very latest in tools such as
>
> + gcc either from the current development branch or the gcc 3.2
> from Red Hat Linux 8;
>
OK in my cooker.
> + binutils preferrably from CVS, from H.J. Lu's latest release for
> Linux, or from RHL 8.
>
Done.
Well, so you need:
- new binutils, easy to do.
- new gcc, already in Mandrake and RedHat (?? about SuSE and others)
- new glibc, probably the first update when Cooker and RawHide are
unfrozen again. And it is a final release.
Problem is kernel 2.5. Too 'risky'.
I would like to ask again: could you state what new kernel features are
needed (futexes, cpu-affinity syscalls, signalling changes...).
Perhaps people can use 2.4 -ac or -aa trees (if for example nptl only
needs futexes).
TIA
--
J.A. Magallon <jamagallon@able.es> \ Software is like sex:
werewolf.able.es \ It's better when it's free
Mandrake Linux release 9.0 (dolphin) for i586
Linux 2.4.20-pre8-jam2 (gcc 3.2 (Mandrake Linux 9.0 3.2-1mdk))
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-04 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-04 8:30 [ANNOUNCE] nptl 0.2 Ulrich Drepper
2002-10-04 9:19 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-10-04 12:17 ` Jakub Jelinek
2002-10-04 15:10 ` J.A. Magallon [this message]
2002-10-09 9:32 ` Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-04 11:58 Tim Tassonis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021004151054.GA1752@werewolf.able.es \
--to=jamagallon@able.es \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.