From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Subject: Re: RAID backup Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 18:15:55 +0100 Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20021004171555.GH710@gallifrey> References: <1033735943.31839.12.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20021004132419.GF710@gallifrey> <20021004150752.B16727@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021004150752.B16727@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> To: Russell King Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids * Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) wrote: > However, drive in caddy or no caddy, the accidental drop test would > probably be more favourable to the DLT tape surviving over the drive. > Physical accidents do happen. While I guess a good caddy might put a lump of rubber in to help. But there again I'm not sure if I have that much confidence in the DLT tapes either; the instructions in the insert for HP DLT tapes tell you to rattle them and listen to hear if you can hear anything loose before putting them into your drive! Anyway, from the side of data integrity the drop test doesn't worry me - for critical data I have a lot more than one backup; and users perform an important part of the backup test system by regularly deleting files to be restored. Dave ---------------- Have a happy GNU millennium! ---------------------- / Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux on Alpha,68K| Happy \ \ gro.gilbert @ treblig.org | MIPS,x86,ARM, SPARC and HP-PA | In Hex / \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/