From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: Kip Walker <kwalker@broadcom.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: do_ri and EPC adjustment
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 14:51:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021005145142.A31477@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D9E10DF.C4C305B2@broadcom.com>; from kwalker@broadcom.com on Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 03:06:23PM -0700
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 03:06:23PM -0700, Kip Walker wrote:
> Sorry if this has already been discussed, but why does do_ri() adjust
> the EPC in compute_return_epc() before delivering the SIGILL to a user
> process?
The original reason was to avoid having knowledge weather to skip over an
instruction or not from the signal return path. For various reasons this
seems a wrong decission.
Ralf
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-05 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-04 22:06 do_ri and EPC adjustment Kip Walker
2002-10-05 12:51 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021005145142.A31477@linux-mips.org \
--to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=kwalker@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.