All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: lell02 <lell02@stud.uni-passau.de>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Status of UDF CD packet writing?
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:45:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021009104537.GD620@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200210091042.g99Agwjm009964@tom.rz.uni-passau.de>

On Wed, Oct 09 2002, lell02 wrote:
> >On Tue, Oct 08 2002, lell02 wrote:
> >> hi, 
> >> 
> >> >Will Jens Axboes patch for CD packet writing for CD-R/RW make it in
> >> >before the feature freeze? I know Jens Axboe is busy with more basic I/O
> >> >stuff, but i sincerely hope it can be squeezed in before 2.6/3.0 is
> >> >released.
> >> 
> >> jens stated on this about 1-2 days ago. he said, it would be little
> >> modification on the ide-cdrom, to make it work with cd-mrw/ packet
> >> writing.  so it could go in after the feature freeze.
> >
> >You might be talking about two different patches -- one for cd-rw
> >support (this is the pktcdvd (or -packet) patch that Peter Osterlund has
> >been maintaining) and the other for cd-mrw. The cd-mrw patch is very
> >small, not a lot is required to support that in the cd driver.
> >Supporting cd-rw is a lot harder, basically you have to do in software
> >what cd-mrw does in hardware (defect management, read-modify-write
> >packet gathering, etc).
> >
> >cd-mrw will definitely be in 2.6. cd-rw support maybe, I haven't even
> >looked at that lately.
> >
> 
> thanx for clearing out these differences. 
> 
> but, isn't cd-mrw supposed to replace the old packet-writing
> technique?  so, in the end, there wouldn't be any need for
> packet-writing, if every burner ships with cd-mrw-support... i read in
> the "specs", that the technology would be much better.

(btw, please break your lines at 72 chars or similar)

Yeah that is true, the need for the cd-rw packet writing patch should
diminish once cd-mrw is in all drives.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2002-10-09 10:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-09 11:37 Status of UDF CD packet writing? lell02
2002-10-09 10:45 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2002-10-09 12:37 ` Brian Gerst
2002-10-10 17:46 ` Bill Davidsen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-09 22:24 lell02
2002-10-08 22:46 lell02
2002-10-09  8:54 ` Jens Axboe
2002-10-08 18:38 Tommy Vestermark

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021009104537.GD620@suse.de \
    --to=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=lell02@stud.uni-passau.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.