From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from zouave.sonic.net (zouave.sonic.net [209.204.172.153]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0D034829 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 10:43:02 -0600 (MDT) Received: from frizzen.efball.com (frizzen.efball.com [192.168.0.27]) by zouave.sonic.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 449E46822 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:42:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:42:58 -0700 From: E Frank Ball To: 'parisc-linux maillist' Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Which Memory to use on a 715/80? Message-ID: <20021010094258.B22402@zouave.sonic.net> Reply-To: frankb@efball.com References: <02Oct10.174726cest.119043@ns.hiscom.nl> <20021010192305.G37854@azrael.smilehouse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 In-Reply-To: <20021010192305.G37854@azrael.smilehouse.com>; from harri.haataja@smilehouse.com on Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 07:23:17PM +0300 Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 07:23:17PM +0300, Harri Haataja wrote: } On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 05:34:47PM +0200, "Beerse, Corné" wrote: } > > -----Original Message----- } > > From: Grant Grundler [mailto:grundlerOdsl2.external.hp.com] } > > Derek Engelhaupt wrote: } > > > Well, don't think any other manufacturer made memory for the 715 } > > > series. I have looked at Dataram and others, but they only seem } > > > to have memory for the D,K,N,L, and A class servers. } > > I thought Kingston *did* (maybe no more). } > I recal by head (and might be wrong) to have used pc-based memory } > modules in a 712/80. There was something with parity (it needs it or } > it hates it, don't know). } } You usually hear that HP uses similiar form but completely different } ram. But that's mostly on 715/735/800, maybe 712 was different. That } would be a pleasant surprise. 715/725/745 and the 712 all use the same type memory. The 730/735 used another type, and the 755 used a unique type. -- E Frank Ball frankb@efball.com