From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>, Rob Radez <rob@osinvestor.com>
Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Watchdog drivers
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 20:01:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021013200104.C23142@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021013194041.A15609@medelec.uia.ac.be>; from wim@iguana.be on Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 07:40:41PM +0200
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 07:40:41PM +0200, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote:
> I'm reviewing the different watchdog drivers and started porting the features
> that have been added in the 2.4 kernel to the 2.5 development kernel.
> I now wondered if it would make sence to put all watchdog drivers in
> drivers/char/watchdog/ instead of in drivers/char ?
> Please comments.
Rob Radez has been doing a lot of work in this area; I thought he
was going to do the 2.5 drivers as well (or his last mail on the
8 August seemed to imply that.) Not sure what happened.
Rob?
--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-13 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-13 17:40 Watchdog drivers Wim Van Sebroeck
2002-10-13 19:01 ` Russell King [this message]
2002-10-13 22:31 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-13 22:43 ` Russell King
2002-10-13 23:17 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-14 1:57 ` Rob Radez
2002-10-14 8:12 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2002-10-14 12:22 ` Dave Jones
2002-10-14 12:41 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2002-10-14 13:04 ` Dave Jones
2002-10-14 15:11 ` Rob Radez
2002-10-15 9:35 ` David Woodhouse
2002-10-15 11:20 ` Dave Jones
2002-10-14 15:58 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-14 9:29 ` Padraig Brady
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-14 15:51 Matt_Domsch
2002-10-14 16:40 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2002-10-14 19:12 ` Matt Domsch
2002-10-15 9:25 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-10-15 17:26 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2002-10-16 21:36 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2002-11-06 13:10 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2002-10-15 12:57 Matt_Domsch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021013200104.C23142@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rob@osinvestor.com \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.