From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: bart.de.schuymer@pandora.be
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, buytenh@gnu.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [RFC] bridge-nf -- map IPv4 hooks onto bridge hooks, vs 2.5.42
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 12:26:28 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021014.122628.63756731.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200210142129.56824.bart.de.schuymer@pandora.be>
From: Bart De Schuymer <bart.de.schuymer@pandora.be>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 21:29:56 +0200
You were the one who asked for that patch.
I asked for the patch to be cleaned up to eliminate
the net/ipv4/*.c hacking. :)
This brings me to another question: I've been told it is the
general concensus that this bridge firewall should be compiled in
the kernel if CONFIG_NETFILTER=y.
I don't have any strong opinion here.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-14 19:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-11 22:32 802.1q + device removal causing hang Simon Kirby
2002-09-11 22:31 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-12 6:36 ` [PATCH] ebtables - Ethernet bridge tables, for 2.5.34 Bart De Schuymer
2002-09-12 23:04 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-13 3:20 ` Bart De Schuymer
2002-09-13 4:29 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-13 6:12 ` Bart De Schuymer
2002-09-13 6:09 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-13 12:45 ` bridge-netfilter patch (was: Re: [PATCH] ebtables - Ethernet bridge tables, for 2.5.34) Lennert Buytenhek
2002-09-13 18:22 ` bridge-netfilter patch David S. Miller
2002-09-14 7:05 ` Bart De Schuymer
2002-09-16 3:35 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-16 21:41 ` Bart De Schuymer
2002-09-16 23:21 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-17 19:10 ` Bart De Schuymer
2002-09-17 19:35 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-15 21:27 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2002-09-16 6:50 ` [PATCH] ebtables - Ethernet bridge tables, for 2.5.35 Bart De Schuymer
2002-09-16 23:01 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-14 18:05 ` [RFC] bridge-nf -- map IPv4 hooks onto bridge hooks, vs 2.5.42 Bart De Schuymer
2002-10-14 18:01 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-14 18:32 ` bert hubert
2002-10-14 18:58 ` Bart De Schuymer
2002-10-14 19:02 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-14 19:29 ` Bart De Schuymer
2002-10-14 19:26 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2002-10-20 22:20 ` [RFC] bridge-nf -- map IPv4 hooks onto bridge hooks, vs 2.5.44 Bart De Schuymer
2002-10-20 22:19 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-22 23:40 ` Bart De Schuymer
2002-10-25 6:01 ` [PATCH][RFC] bridge-nf -- map IPv4 hooks onto bridge hooks - try 3, " Bart De Schuymer
2002-10-25 6:22 ` [netfilter-core] " Harald Welte
2002-10-28 13:02 ` David S. Miller
[not found] ` <200210141953.38933.bart.de.schuymer@pandora.be>
2002-10-14 19:59 ` [RFC] place to put bridge-netfilter specific data in the skbuff Bart De Schuymer
2002-10-24 8:16 ` [netfilter-core] " Harald Welte
2002-10-24 8:15 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-24 12:22 ` Harald Welte
2002-09-12 23:49 ` 802.1q + device removal causing hang Simon Kirby
2002-09-12 23:53 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021014.122628.63756731.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=bart.de.schuymer@pandora.be \
--cc=buytenh@gnu.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.