From: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Setting queue depths in the scsi mid layer, an intro
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 21:28:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021015012809.GG1274@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021014181512.A7237@eng2.beaverton.ibm.com>
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 06:15:12PM -0700, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
> Doug -
>
> Finally looking at and using the new queue depth code in 2.5.42.
>
> Why are there two kmalloc()'s in scsi.c scsi_build_commandblocks()?
>
> They both use the same flags, including GFP_ATOMIC:
>
> void scsi_build_commandblocks(Scsi_Device * SDpnt)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
> Scsi_Cmnd *SCpnt;
>
> if (SDpnt->queue_depth != 0)
> return;
>
> SCpnt = (Scsi_Cmnd *) kmalloc(sizeof(Scsi_Cmnd), GFP_ATOMIC |
> (SDpnt->host->unchecked_isa_dma ? GFP_DMA : 0));
> if (NULL == SCpnt) {
> /*
> * Since we don't currently have *any* command blocks on this
> * device, go ahead and try an atomic allocation...
> */
> SCpnt = (Scsi_Cmnd *) kmalloc(sizeof(Scsi_Cmnd), GFP_ATOMIC |
> (SDpnt->host->unchecked_isa_dma ? GFP_DMA : 0));
> if (NULL == SCpnt)
> return; /* Oops, we aren't going anywhere for now */
> }
Oops. Oversight. It was from the time when I had the first allocation as
GFP_KERNEL and then an ATOMIC backup. I changed that because this is
called from non-sleep allowed contexts (tasklet/softirq) and therefore
must always use ATOMIC. So, it only needs one allocation attempt.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> 919-754-3700 x44233
Red Hat, Inc.
1801 Varsity Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27606
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-15 1:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-11 2:46 Setting queue depths in the scsi mid layer, an intro Doug Ledford
2002-10-11 10:34 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-11 10:39 ` Doug Ledford
2002-10-11 12:47 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-11 12:49 ` Doug Ledford
2002-10-11 13:22 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-15 1:15 ` Patrick Mansfield
2002-10-15 1:28 ` Doug Ledford [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021015012809.GG1274@redhat.com \
--to=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.