All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Clausen <clausen@gnu.org>
To: Steve Pratt <slpratt@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>,
	Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.name>, Shawn <core@enodev.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Michael Clark <michael@metaparadigm.com>,
	Mark Peloquin <markpeloquin@hotmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com,
	evms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Evms-devel] Re: Linux v2.5.42
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 07:18:39 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021015211839.GA1143@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF982AE23E.E16B3B93-ON85256C53.004DC696@pok.ibm.com>

On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 09:51:15AM -0500, Steve Pratt wrote:
> Please don't say that. I just searched the EVMS mailing list archives
> dating back to December 2000 and there is not a single patch from you
> Andrew. One or 2 pieces of psuedo-code, but no real patches.  Feel free to
> look yourself, the archives are online.

Ah, you are correct.  I was trying to find out if there was interest
in me actually making the patches, before spending the time on it.

I came to the conclusion there was no interest.

> > Does anyone want me to dig them up?
> 
> Sure, if they really exist.
> 
> Andrew, just so you are aware, a number of your suggestions did make it
> into EVMS even if you are not aware of it because they did not hapopen
> immediately.  Some that come to mind that I think you originally proposed
> are plug-in progress indicators (from pedtimer), nesting of partitions,
> plug-in record header changes (multiple plug-ins per file).  These are just
> the ones that come to mind, so keep the suggestion (and patches if you can
> find any) coming.

Ah, I didn't realise :)  Will do, if I can find some free time.
(Uni is *really* heavy ATM :( )

Cheers,
Andrew


  reply	other threads:[~2002-10-15 21:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-15 14:51 [Evms-devel] Re: Linux v2.5.42 Steve Pratt
2002-10-15 21:18 ` Andrew Clausen [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-14 23:57 Mark Peloquin
2002-10-13 17:06 Brian Jackson
2002-10-13 19:58 ` Mark Hahn
2002-10-14  4:55   ` [Evms-devel] " Andreas Dilger
2002-10-12 17:14 Mark Peloquin
2002-10-13 12:41 ` [Evms-devel] " Michael Clark
2002-10-13 13:49   ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-10-13 15:16     ` Michael Clark
2002-10-13 15:35       ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-10-13 16:11         ` Brian Jackson
2002-10-13 17:46           ` Robert Love
2002-10-14  4:23             ` [Evms-devel] " Andreas Dilger
2002-10-14 16:08               ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-10-13 16:18         ` Michael Clark
2002-10-13 17:10           ` Alexander Viro
2002-10-13 17:41             ` Michael Clark
2002-10-14  4:43               ` Andreas Dilger
2002-10-14 16:16                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-10-14 15:21               ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-10-14 14:42             ` Shawn
2002-10-14 15:15           ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-10-14 14:20         ` Shawn
2002-10-14 16:15           ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-14 21:34             ` Shawn
2002-10-14 16:21           ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-10-14 16:38             ` Jeff Garzik
2002-10-14 21:47             ` Shawn
2002-10-15  7:42               ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2002-10-14 21:48             ` Oliver Neukum
2002-10-14 21:55               ` Shawn
2002-10-14 22:35                 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-10-14 22:53                   ` Shawn
2002-10-14 23:04                     ` Oliver Neukum
2002-10-14 23:16                       ` Alexander Viro
2002-10-14 23:30                         ` Oliver Neukum
2002-10-15  0:10                         ` Andrew Clausen
2002-10-14 22:57                   ` Alexander Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021015211839.GA1143@gnu.org \
    --to=clausen@gnu.org \
    --cc=core@enodev.com \
    --cc=evms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=markpeloquin@hotmail.com \
    --cc=michael@metaparadigm.com \
    --cc=oliver@neukum.name \
    --cc=slpratt@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    --cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.