From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 21:39:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 21:39:52 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:57804 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 21:39:52 -0400 Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 18:38:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20021018.183811.124466701.davem@redhat.com> To: dipankar@in.ibm.com Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockfree rtcache using RCU From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20021019065210.A26806@in.ibm.com> References: <20021019065210.A26806@in.ibm.com> X-FalunGong: Information control. X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dipankar, I had to revert this patch. Where is read_barrier_depends() defined? I do not see it in current 2.5.x sources.