From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from pippin.tausq.org (gandalf.tausq.org [64.81.244.94]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39969482E for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 09:54:39 -0600 (MDT) Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 08:57:52 -0700 From: Randolph Chung To: Thibaut VARENE Cc: phi , parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Linux version 2.4.19-pa22 uname -a fault. Message-ID: <20021018155752.GV5602@tausq.org> Reply-To: Randolph Chung References: <3DA56CAE00003154@ocpmta8.be.tiscali.com> <3DB015AF.C26FA30B@hpfrcu03.france.hp.com> <3DB02B96.6050702@esiee.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <3DB02B96.6050702@esiee.fr> Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: > I saw that recently after dist-upgrading a debian unstable. > There is a bugreport already filled at debian bts. > Dunno if it's closed yet. no it's not. debian's uname has some procinfo patch in it that's quite broken imo. i'm going to submit a patch for this this weekend. randolph