From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 06:26:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 06:24:57 -0400 Received: from smtp.kolej.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.25.225]:33548 "EHLO smtp.kolej.mff.cuni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 06:24:40 -0400 X-Envelope-From: pavel@bug.ucw.cz Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:21:27 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Andi Kleen Cc: "Nakajima, Jun" , "David S. Miller" , torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Mallick, Asit K" , "Saxena, Sunil" Subject: Re: [PATCH] fixes for building kernel using Intel compiler Message-ID: <20021021092127.GC2876@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20021019042929.A18070@wotan.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021019042929.A18070@wotan.suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > BTW do you have any benchmark / code size results to share with > Intel compiler vs gcc 3.2 ? How much does it give ? Also does it work properly after compiling with icc? Working well with second compiler would be pretty good news for both kernel and icc... Pavel -- Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala sourceforge.net. What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email?