All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakob Oestergaard <jakob@unthought.net>
To: raid@ddx.a2000.nu
Cc: Chris Siebenmann <cks@utcc.utoronto.ca>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is Read speed faster when 1 disk is failed on raid5 ?
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 12:45:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021022104522.GC24075@unthought.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210221154500.26127-100000@ddx.a2000.nu>

On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:58:56AM +0200, raid@ddx.a2000.nu wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Chris Siebenmann wrote:
> >  At a guess: when RAID-5 is intact, the kernel must read the entire
> > stripe size worth of data to verify the parity. When a RAID-5 array has
> > a dead disk, any intact data block can be handed to the application
> > the moment it comes off the disk as there is no point in doing parity
> > verification. (The kernel has to reconstruct the missing blocks, but
> > most of the blocks are present and good.)
> 
> i thought raid5 was doing parity calculation when writing ?

Correct. RAID-5 will not do parity calculation when reading. RAID-5 will
give you availability but it will not give you integrity.

> difference between rading from failed an intact raid5 is almost twice the
> speed (failed is doing 150MB/sec, intact is doing 80MB/sec)

I didn't follow the beginning of this thread, sorry.  Is this SCSI?

-- 
................................................................
:   jakob@unthought.net   : And I see the elder races,         :
:.........................: putrid forms of man                :
:   Jakob Østergaard      : See him rise and claim the earth,  :
:        OZ9ABN           : his downfall is at hand.           :
:.........................:............{Konkhra}...............:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2002-10-22 10:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <02Oct22.043816edt.62658@gpu.utcc.utoronto.ca>
2002-10-22  9:58 ` Is Read speed faster when 1 disk is failed on raid5 ? raid
2002-10-22 10:45   ` Jakob Oestergaard [this message]
2002-10-22 10:49     ` raid
2002-10-22 11:24       ` Jakob Oestergaard
2002-10-28 18:27         ` Yiqiang Ding
2002-10-28 21:02           ` Jakob Oestergaard
2002-10-28 21:37             ` Yiqiang Ding
2002-10-29  0:30               ` Jakob Oestergaard
2002-10-29 21:05                 ` Yiqiang Ding
2002-10-31 11:56                   ` Jakob Oestergaard
2002-10-10 21:18 3ware 7500-12, bad write speed raid
2002-10-17  8:19 ` Is Read speed faster when 1 disk is failed on raid5 ? raid
2002-10-17 11:52   ` raid

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021022104522.GC24075@unthought.net \
    --to=jakob@unthought.net \
    --cc=cks@utcc.utoronto.ca \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=raid@ddx.a2000.nu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.