From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott McDermott Subject: Re: NFS Locking Issue - Solaris-Linux Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 12:21:31 -0400 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20021023122131.G14314@questra.com> References: <3DB56CF3.29848F2F@neolinear.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from ns1.questra.com ([64.132.48.186] helo=questra.com) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 184U1G-0001Rq-00 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:30:30 -0700 Received: (from mcdermot@localhost) by odio.roc.questra.com (8.11.6/8.11.4) id g9NGLVf18339 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 12:21:31 -0400 To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <3DB56CF3.29848F2F@neolinear.com>; from wschrier@neolinear.com on Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:21:23AM -0400 Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Bill Schrier on Tue 22/10 11:21 -0400: > The corresponding line from our auto_direct table follows: > /zone -actimeo=0,vers=2 raidzone:/home I thought vers=2 did not support the NLM (so you won't get locking). I seem to remember eagerly awaiting the v3 code and patching my machines so I could get file locks. That was a while ago... why are you using vers=2 btw? I think you mentioned Solaris 2.6 as the earliest version; that mounts v3 I think. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0002en _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs