From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
To: Paul Larson <plars@linuxtestproject.org>
Cc: Frank Cornelis <fcorneli@elis.rug.ac.be>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] extended ptrace
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 14:45:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021023184519.GA18122@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1035388815.5646.42.camel@plars>
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:00:13AM -0500, Paul Larson wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 11:01, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:33:17AM -0500, Paul Larson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 10:01, Frank Cornelis wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > A new extended ptrace patch is available at:
> > > > http://www.elis.rug.ac.be/~fcorneli/downloads/devel/exptrace-0.3.1.patch.gz
> > > Do you (or anyone else) have any good tests for this, or even ptrace in
> > > general? I'm working on some ptrace tests for LTP, but if someone
> > > already has something to contribute it would save me some time. :)
> >
> > GDB and gdbserver get a good range of it; just pick a couple of the
> > standard tests (to avoid problems with all the GDB bugs the testsuite
> > turns up :). I have some more precise tests but they're for
> > features that haven't been accepted yet.
> Precise tests that can be automated and ran under our test harness are
> more along the lines of what I'm looking for. If those features do go
> in, it might be nice to have them in LTP if you don't mind.
No, I mean from GDB's automated regression suite. Build gdb from
source and 'make check' to see it. There's a lot of tests which fail
for reasons you aren't interested in, but a lot of them could just be
incorporated.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-23 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-23 15:01 [PATCH] extended ptrace Frank Cornelis
2002-10-23 15:33 ` Paul Larson
2002-01-16 19:28 ` Pavel Machek
2002-10-23 16:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-10-23 16:00 ` Paul Larson
2002-10-23 18:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021023184519.GA18122@nevyn.them.org \
--to=dan@debian.org \
--cc=fcorneli@elis.rug.ac.be \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=plars@linuxtestproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.