From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Dilger Subject: Re: [ext3-users] To compare Linux journalised filesystem, part II. Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 11:08:26 -0600 Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20021024170826.GI28822@clusterfs.com> References: <3DB823AA.6010405@eprocess.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3DB823AA.6010405@eprocess.fr> Errors-to: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Fabien Combernous Cc: ext3-users@redhat.com, jfs-discussion , reiserfs , linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com On Oct 24, 2002 18:45 +0200, Fabien Combernous wrote: > +--------+------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | quotas | Again "Y" is not aqual. ext3 accept quota only on data-journaled | > | | filesystems, but all other journaled filesystem don't have data | > +--------+------------------------------------------------------------------+ Granted that I have never used quotas, so it is possible that I am incorrect. However, my understanding is that yes, you do need data-journaled quota files to ensure that your quota tables don't miss some operations after a crash. However, you can separately select data journaling for files in ext3 (via chattr), even if the rest of the filesystem is using data=ordered (the default). Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/