From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Drokin Subject: Re: To compare Linux journalised filesystem, part II. Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:48:04 +0400 Message-ID: <20021025094804.A1197@namesys.com> References: <3DB823AA.6010405@eprocess.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3DB823AA.6010405@eprocess.fr> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Fabien Combernous Cc: ext3-users@redhat.com, jfs-discussion , reiserfs , linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Hello! On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 06:45:30PM +0200, Fabien Combernous wrote: > +------------------+-----+------+-----+----------+------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | NFS | Y | Y | Y | Y | nfs works on all of them. You need at least reiserfs v3.6. NFS will work with reiserfs v3.5 too, just there is a probability of having problems with reusing object ids (and therefore the inode numbers too). > |data journal | N | Y | N | N | Only ext3 can take care of data by a data journal. All other journaled | > | | | | | | file systems have "only" a metadata journal. | No. Chris Mason have set of patches that implement data journaling for reiserfs, too. Bye, Oleg